There were also many other problems with the experiment such as selection bias (being attracted to an experiment about prison life must have said something about the person), Zimbardo’s duo-role (as the superintendent, he could actively influence the guard’s behaviors, which could affect the experiment), the insufficient sample participants (24 male Stanford undergrad students of about the same age is too small of a basis to generalize the whole population), and much more. In other words, the findings of this experiment are not solid enough to reach a conclusion. In Shuttleworth’s article, the experiment is described in detail based on a documentary of the experiment posted on Youtube. The article summarized the video and the experiment very well, using facts and figures mentioned in the video, such as the $15 pay per day for the participants in a 2 week experiment. However, there is also a question of reliability, and the fact that Philip Zimbardo was present in the documentary makes the source reliable enough in that this source is a primary source, therefore it makes Shuttleworth’s information accurate.
Stanford Prison Experiment
Ethical issues are always first and foremost a subject of ambiguous grounds when it comes to experiments that are hinged on human behavior. Whether this is because of the short- and long-term consequences of psychological and physical harm, ethical questions are raised with regards to how much scientific benefit can be accrued from conducting such an experiment. This question remains heavily controversial especially in the Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted in 1971 at Stanford University. The idea in question was whether the social and physical behaviors in prison life was conducted because of the people in the environment or whether the situation in itself applies a general stress of how to react to such an environment.
"What happens when you put good people in an evil place?" (Zimbardo, 1999) and "Does humanity win over evil, or does evil triumph?" (Zimbardo, 1999) are only the starting points of this……
Conclusion The Stanford Prison Experiment, although deemed unethical and unable to be replicated, has provided insight in how people might behave in certain situations. The study shows sampling imperfections and a lack of ecological validity, which could have been addressed if IRBs had existed in 1971. Nevertheless, the Stanford Prison Experiment remains one of the most influential studies in raising the issue of ethics and protecting human rights. ?
More importantly, they were not guaranteed the right to terminate the experiment at their will. When Prisoner 8621 asked to get out of the experiment he was summarily ridiculed and sent back. It was only when he screamed that Zimbardo was forced to let him quit. Guards were also given far too much leeway in their ability to mentally abuse and thoroughly humiliate the prisoners. There were no checks on their behavior.
Interestingly, Zimbardo and the other directors seemed to be aware of their ethical transgressions. On visiting day, they purposefully cleaned up the prison to sterilize its appearance and make the parents feel appeased. Their actions clearly show they were aware of the sadism inherent in the prison experiment and were covering it up. Oddly, Zimbardo seems less than remorseful even in retrospect. The Stanford prison experiment left as much of a legacy on creating ethical standards in psychology……
Was the Stanford prison experiment ethical? | Essay …
the Stanford Prison Experiment Essay or current events and analyze how the Stanford Prison Experiment and Lord of the Flies topics (child abuse, senior.
Stanford Prison Experiment Essay - Paper Topics
Analysis of The Stanford Prison Experiment. 3 Pages 685 Words November 2014. Saved essays Popular topics. Acceptance; Acceptance Essays; Advertising; Animals; Arts.
Stanford Prison Experiment: Summary & Ethics | …
Essay on the Zimbardo Stanford The result of the experiment showed how the prison This is a sample Zimbardo Stanford Corrections Experiment from.
-Briefly summarize either the Stanford Prison or the Milgram experiment.-Explain what one ..Save Essay; View my Saved Essays Topics in this paper. Prison; Stanford Prison; What were your first impressions of the Stanford Prison Experiment.
Save time and order An Analysis of the Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment essay ..Perils of Obedience" and the "Stanford Prison Experiment"
Both "The Perils of Obedience" and the "Stanford Prison Experiment" essentially demonstrate the potential for 'evil' in ordinary citizens when placed in situations where stark authority is pitted against the individual's own moral imperatives (Milgram) or when deindividuated potential perpetrators are given total power over powerless victims (Zimbardo). Though the experiments differed vastly in design and methodology, the point of both experiments was to observe how far an individual would go in inflicting increasing pain on a victim.
There were several common ethical issues thrown up by both experiments. As Zimbardo says, "The line between Good and Evil lies in the center of every human heart...not in some abstract moral, celestial space..." (Sonoma State University eb site) Similarly, Milgram observes, "Conservative philosophers argue that the very fabric of society is threatened by disobedience, while humanists stress the primacy of the individual conscience."……